UCI Annual Report and Financial Accounts

Money makes the wheels go round in pro cycling and the governing body has just quietly published its annual report on UCI.ch. Here’s a look at the financial report for the calendar year ending 2013 and the summary take is a steady year.

Normally this document came out in late September but now it’s two months earlier, an improvement and a campaign pledge by Brian Cookson is met although he did reference large corporates who typically produce their annual report even faster. Reading the report you see projects to build BMX tracks in Aigle… which have been completed so the document is always a bit dated.

click to enlarge

Income Statement

  • 2012 was a bonanza thanks to the Olympics but 2013 has been very good too with a total income of 33.4m Swiss Francs (CHF) compared to CHF 44.1m for 2012, boosted by an additional CHF 1.9 million from the Games paid in during 2013
  • As ever the UCI promotes the World Championships and this is its single biggest income earner, accounting for roughly half of the UCI’s annual income
  • The road cycling world championships in Florence account for CHF 11.4 million of the UCI’s income. That’s 68% of the income derived from the World Championships or expressed another way, the road worlds account for one third of the UCI’s total annual income
  • Track and mountain bike world championships are the next two most lucrative worlds with CHF 1.9m and CHF 1.6 million respectively
  • One fall we can perhaps cheer is the reduction in anti-doping fines, down from CHF 1.3 million to CHF 0.3 million. My understanding here is that 2012 was skewed by the large payment resulting from Alberto Contador’s Tour de France positive
  • Marketing and communication costs are now CHF 1.35 million, up from CHF 0.9 million. There’s no breakdown of what this is involves but it seems enormous considering we don’t see much marketing or communication. As an aside though the UCI is planning a new website and its Twitter feed is starting to interact with people so we should begin to see more
  • On the costs side fees and expenses fell to around CHF 2 million, down by a third. Again there’s no breakdown here but this saving helped balance some of the fall in revenues

Overall these are steady results and the Olympic jackpot is being spread over four years on various development projects all while the UCI kicks a further CHF 2.5 million into its reserves as it builds up a cash pile to see it through any leaner times. Bad times could include future problems at the Olympics or maybe even losing a big bio passport case at the CAS; also see the difficulty in finding venues for the various world championships.

Non profit association
A reminder that the UCI is an “association” under Swiss law which better translates as a charity. This means it has a non-profit status and with it comes tax perks for the governing body and its staff.

World Cycling Center
The WCC is the UCI’s development operation and new for 2013 was the construction of a BMX track next to the UCI’s HQ. While there are accounts the real numbers are that 288 coaches and 146 athletes received 9,186 days of training. It’s got satellite centres around the world. Not all of this is a cost, indeed new rules requiring agents to register and team managers to attend courses are sometimes bemoaned as money-making schemes for the UCI.

UCI World Tour
As the accounts say, the UCI WorldTour is not an independent legal entity, but an activity of UCI that is partly managed by an ad hoc committee, the Professional Cycling Council (PCC), that is under the responsibility of UCI’s Management Committee

  • In 2012 €200,000 was given to the Volta a Catalunya to cover the race’s financial difficulties and in 2013 €100,000 was paid out to unknown races to keep it/them afloat
  • In 2013 they spent CHF 270,000 on marketing, PR and communication which is too much and too little at the same time. Too much because you wonder where it went given there’s little to see but too little because people still talk of Pro Tour and the World Tour website should be a real hub for the pro calendar just as, say, the WTP website is for women’s tennis

Cycling Anti Doping Foundation
This is the anti-doping unit that is increasingly being moved out of the UCI, witness the move last September when Pat McQuaid stood down as a director to make way for independent experts. But there’s a long way to go before anti-doping becomes truly independent from the UCI, on a small level its offices are down the corridor from President Cookson’s office, more fundamentally it is funded by the teams, race organisers, riders and the UCI itself meaning it’s dependent on, rather than independent from, the UCI.

The major funders are always the teams with 71% (Professional and Professional Continental Teams), followed by the UCI (13%), organisers (12%) and riders (4%). In 2013 they provided CADF with CHF 6,656,000 which enabled the CADF to take more than 14,000 samples (blood and urine, in and out of competition). The biological passport programme remains the most important activity managed by the Foundation.

Global Cycling Promotions
This is the UCI’s race promotion arm although confusingly it doesn’t promote the UCI’s World Championships. Instead it’s the entity behind the Tour of Beijing. Having sucked money out of the UCI and others in recent years GCP is starting to stand on its own feet. The accounts report a CHF 77,000 annual profit but this only after billing the UCI 85,000 in consultancy fees.

Incumbency Power
One reason why it took years to challenge Pat McQuaid was the difficulty in an outsider running for the office of President. The UCI’s own annual spells this out with the incumbent having certain advantages:

“In the months leading up to the Congress (in September), part of the [Communication] Service’s activities were dedicated to Pat McQuaid’s presidential re-election campaign”
– page 66

Financial Relay
2013 saw Brian Cookson elected as President but most of the year was part of Pat McQuaid’s time. The Congress to elect Cookson and the battle before it brought “additional legal and communications costs that the UCI had to absorb before the Florence Conference“. The accounts have been presented by Alain Siegrist, a survivor from the McQuaid era given a lot of other senior types in the UCI have gone.

Missing Money
Remember these are the accounts for 2013 so the millions being spent on the Cycling Independent Reform Commission don’t show. The CIRC will report its findings in 2015 so expect deductions to appear next year and the year after that.

2013 will be remembered as a year of change for the UCI’s management but in the background the finances were stable, a boost from the Olympics allowed more money to be socked away in the reserve fund. We might think of cycling as the Tour de France and spring classics but for the UCI the Olympics and the road cycling world championships are the big events, at least in terms of income.

If 2013 was a steady year for the money it’ll be interesting to see where things go in the coming years. We know millions are being spent on the CIRC. With bold reforms to the calendar and more on the 2020 agenda the sport is set to see big changes and these will alter the costs and revenues. The same as the UCI tries to kickstart women’s racing, it’ll presumably require investment. As such the finances of the past are not a big deal, the leadership is important to the future. But everything is easier with a CHF 20 million reserve fund.

18 thoughts on “UCI Annual Report and Financial Accounts”

  1. Top work again Mr Inrng.

    Quick question, will the Commonwealth Games boost the UCI funds in a similar way to the Olympics (albeit by a smaller amount)?

    • Good question, I’m not sure there’s any substantial link. The events are held under UCI rules so it should be supplying commissaires but it’s not in charge of the games nor having much managerial/voting input. By contrast the UCI is a member of the IOC so it gets its legitimacy and funding this way.

  2. Ugh, the Olympics? I find them disgusting, overdone, and boring. The NFL of international sporting competition.

    Buuuut, if they fund things like Paris-Roubaix and Milan SanRemo, hey, I love ’em!

    Nice financial analysis. This is pretty interesting.

    I kinda like that cycling is low-key on the world stage. When sports get too popular it seems that they always become really stale. I’m looking at you, say, surfing.

  3. A couple of questions:

    Will the UCI produce a CADF report for 2013?

    Is anyone else wondering how GCP revenues flow? It’s run by UCI employees. It seems like that is ample opportunity for graft. GCP gets a race onto the WT calendar, or nearly so, by buying some influence from GCP “employees.”

    • The CADF is becoming more independent. We had accounts last year, this time they’re supposed to be so separate they’re not in the UCI report but we can still see the budget (down slightly).

      The GCP topic’s long been a concern. The UCI’s fast-tracked its own races on to the calendar but it’s not worked out so well, see the aborted Tour of Hangzhou which promised some good roads and racing but it was rushed onto the calendar without a test event and never happened, surely unthinkable for a race if it was run by anyone else. The good news is that GCP didn’t burn up too much cash in 2013 but it shows that Beijing is still a loss-making race.

  4. Offtopic: nice for the Tour de Wallonie: with the exception of one lonely swiss all the various classements are won by belgians. Or maybe it isn’t so offtopic: It’s always good for the finances and future of a race when one of their own wins (although I think Gianni Meersman is flemish?). On tv it looked like only 50 people were watching at the finish and they were all very casual. I felt sorry for the riders, but hopefully it just looked that way on tv. People really have to actually GO to races, have fun and show support! I at least can’t wait for my hometown race, the Cyclassics. I will be at the finish and believe me:I will cheer!!! Ok-now it is offtopic, oh well.

    • Nina,

      Good on you for supporting your local race !

      Most people follow the GT’s and a few other big name races. It’s the fan support and volunteerism at the smaller races that make this sport thrive.

      As for me, I am off to my namesake race.

  5. When are the UCI going to reveal the truth about the 2013 Le Tour ?

    All of a sudden , there are NO Sanctions at the Le Tour ? Yet the 100th Le Tour would have had the Racers slavering for immortality !

    Who is responsible ? We know that there are still people out there thinking they are ” Too Clever ” , as shown by the outcry about the recently revealed UCI report that included Menchov .

    • The split mentioned above is ok but it’s interesting to know how independent it is. If the CADF for example wanted to test a lot more World Tour riders more often would the teams say “go ahead, here’s the money” or “sorry, we won’t pay any more”. Certainly you wonder if the races should pay more, a scandal-free sport is good for ASO and RCS.

Comments are closed.