Pozzato’s Farce

Che buffonata, what a farce. In two words Filippo Pozzato sums up the last three months and more.

Today saw the hearing of cyclist at the Italian National Olympic Commission (CONI) after he was charged with consulting Michele Ferrari, the infamous sports scientist. The case is both a farce and a serious issue.

Michele Ferrari was banned in 2002. But… when a ruling was passed in 2007 concerning bans, a loophole meant that Ferrari’s name was not on the list. If you want to examine the Byzantine procedures at work, the excellent cyclingpro.it blog covers it in italiano but for now, just note that Ferrari was banned yet not on a list of banned coaches.

Fast forward to 2009. Police from Florence were tracking Yaroslav Popovych – don’t ask – and quickly widened the investigation to include other riders. In a scene almost from The Wire, it seems Pozzato’s phone was tapped during and he apparently was recorded – speaking in local dialect – that he was working with Ferrari. The same police say he was paying €40-50,000 a year to Ferrari.

Covered in Teflon?

Eugenio Capodacqua, the scourge of dopers on the Italian peninsula got hold of the story and printed it La Republica column. When confronted, Pozzato admitted to working with Ferrari but said he was only paying for training schedules. There was no evidence of doping so no chance of a two year ban. But working with a banned doctor is still punishable under the Italian rules.

It’s here that Pozzato’s lawyer, Pierfilippo Capello (son of Fabio, the football manager) concocted a clever excuse. Because Ferrari did not appear on the list there was no way to know he was banned. Therefore when a dutiful Pozzato sat down to browse the CONI website he found the list of banned coaching staff he noted Ferrari’s name was not there and reasonably assumed it was fine to go ahead and work with the infamous doctor because, for all the bad things people say, Pippo only wanted training plans and this didn’t seem to be banned!

Knocked down but back up again

This once again reminds us of the weakness in the sport: teams do not seem to offer adequate support and coaching so many riders turn to private coaching. Or the more cynical take is that some squads want any suspicious practices outsourced so there’s no comeback if a rider is caught. Both views can be true.

Pozzato now has a three month ban which ends on 19 September, remember he’d been on hold during the summer and so unable to attend the Olympics. The verdict suits everyone yet disgraces them all at the same time:

  • CONI looks stupid for leaving the biggest name they’ve ever banned off the all-important list. When an agency cannot handle its own paperwork it’s embarrassing. But they still get to ban a rider.
  • Pozzato has been outed as working with Ferrari but all he gets is three months when CONI wanted two years, double the normal sanction. He is complaining but he’s slid away from prosecution almost like he was covered in oil.

What next?
Pozzato can start racing with several upcoming end of season races awaiting. He’ll try to put this behind him and is hunting for a new team, there is talk of a return to Katusha now that the management has changed or he could go to Movistar, where fellow Ferrari-client Giovanni Visconti is racing. That seems to be it, the case goes back to 2009 and there’s no evidence of anything more than training plans, although if you believe he was just getting training program for €40,000 then Santa Claus and his elves are busy picking a nice present for delivery to you in December.

Nobody seems to have a bad word to say. He’s a likeable rider, the playboy image he’s tried to present covers an often modest and sincere man who lives at home with two dogs for company. Even the usually outspoken critics of doping are welcoming Pozzato back:

Also Pozzato is not alone here. Visconti, Enrico Gasparotto and Michele Scarponi are also going to face the same hearings as La Republica’s wiretap story also rumbled them. But their lawyers try similar tactics then they should have little to worry about.

We all make errors when copying and pasting information and Italian bureaucracy can legendary for its confusion. But this CONI’s omission of Michele Ferrari from the list is a big one.

I’m not sure about a two year ban for paying a banned coach. As we saw with Fränk Schleck, wiring money to a doctor of dope is not a crime nor a breach of the rules and crucially nor is it proof of doping. It is only proof of wiring money. But it is highly suspicious and paperwork mistakes aside, if a coach is banned then anyone hiring then the ban has to be upheld, including sanctions for those who seek to break it.

For another piece I’ve been look up doping cases from the past 20 years and procedural errors were alarmingly common. Medical certificates were fudged, bans were not properly imposed and there are many more tales of paperwork and loopholes. This is a reminder of the mess from the past, a time when the WADA Code didn’t exist and national and international rules often clashed and when agencies and governing bodies were not kept in check by the likes of WADA.

But if we think this is a story from the past, it’s not. Many active athletes have been hiring Ferrari and the Padova investigation into Ferrari rumbles on. It could stop but if the prosecutors bring charges there could still throw up some giant surprises.

36 thoughts on “Pozzato’s Farce”

  1. With the farce of Pippo’s ban and Contador saying that in his mind he’s won 7 grand tours, the peloton remains dirty as ever. The mindset has to change or the young guys will keep paying the price. I don’t see a swift change, only the gradual phasing out of these characters from the peloton will clean it, hopefully.

    • Ankush – Let’s now panic and be dramatic. This does not prove that the peloton is as dirty as ever, it only proves that the institutions around cycling are as incompetent, unreliable, and idiotic as ever.

  2. Good summary but little surprise. Reduced sentances (eg Contodor), for whatever reason appear the norn now.

    Interesting to note the two pro tour teams after Pippo !

    Until the sport gets rid of the dross for good, there will be no change.

  3. These kind of issues make me wonder about those that shriek about “false positives” where the innocent racer is snared in some unfair procedure. The cheaters skip through so many loopholes to get away with anything from steroids in their chamois cream to “the banned doctor wasn’t on the list” for excuses, it seems you really have to be careless or stupid to get sanctioned. Pippo might be talented but he’s not too bright it seems. Luca Scinto couldn’t do much with him, who’ll be the next to waste their time? He’s on the Frank Vandenbroucke trajectory now…but I hope he stops short of VDB’s sad ending.

  4. actually, it was former pro rider Guido Trenti, that recorded the phone conversation where Pozzato admitted working with Ferrari. Apparently he needed money and was used to ask Pozzato for it, and the stolen conversation is believed to be a trick to force him into offering financial help

  5. A couple of points to note , shouldn’t the UCI , CONI or any other acronym make the teams accountable for who the riders train with ? Ie All Pro-Tour and Pro-Conti teams have on staff or at least have contracted accredited coaches and medical staff as part of the requirements to race in those divisions ? I can see from the comments that everyone seems to play the man (Pozzato) and not the ball (teams and managers !) . It seems that everyone wants a bottom up approach , fans included. Squeeze the riders , most of whom seem to have the least power due to temporary nature of their contracted work when the real squeeze should be on the managers and team owners who should be directly accountable for their staff. I think that it would then be easy to sanction riders , any rider caught working with any other support staff not accredited by them and UCI faces an automatic 6 month hiatus.

  6. What a farce. The gains well outweigh the penalties. Until the gain/penalty math is HEAVILY on the penalty side we are pissing into the wind. Personally I love to cycle and push myself but find the pro scene a farce and not worth a flying f star star k.

    Anyhoo…. thanks inrng for the blog. I enjoy your thing.

  7. Don’t forget Pozatto once accused a fellow member of the peloton of “spitting in the soup”. I can’t recall who it was aimed at, but it’s stuck with me. I’ve always felt he willingly signs up to the code of silence.

  8. so he didn’t see the doctor’s name on the banned list, hadn’t read any newspaper, never talked to a fellow rider (where did he get the doctors number?) and hadn’t consulted any of his team physio staff about it … perfectly plausible as he lives in a biscuit tin and never ventures out into the world … what’s to doubt?

    the real silly bit is that the UCI, IOC, et al, have these ridiculous 1/4 measures to show they’re “tough on crime” but really net out nothing for anyone to be afraid of … now they’re toying with the idea of granting amnesty for confessions … brilliant! let them dope, as long as they tell us about it with the prerequisite tears and boo-boo face, all is forgiven, get back to riding your bike …

    and people wonder why no one takes cycling seriously ?

    • All just-in-time to let the corruption at the UCI pass via amnesty. These crooks talk not only out of both sides of their mouth, but from other orifices as well. Cycling needs a thorough house-cleaning.

  9. inrng dyou have an idea whether this ban prevents him from picking up WorldTour points for two years? Or whether it counts as a ‘first offence’ (i.e. second offence=lifetime ban)?

    Second seems unlikely considering Di Luca. First also seems unlikely obviously.

  10. 2 thoughts for the future:
    1) Everything that is not explicitly banned is unquestionably legal, suspicious as it may be.
    2) The way evidence is obtained does matter. Wiretapping riders is very questionable, to say the least, and I think the European Court of Human Rights will, when finally consulted, rule against it.

Comments are closed.